Tomato potato psyllid insecticide resistance management strategy (for potatoes)

adult tomato potato psyllid
Adult tomato potato psyllid,
Bactericera cockerelli (Hemiptera: Triozidae),
with moulted skin of nymph and yellow
eggs on stalks. © Plant & Food Research

Herman TJB & Walker GP (updated Dec24)

Reasons for strategy and update

Tomato potato psyllid (TPP), Bactericera cockerelli, populations are capable of becoming resistant to a wide range of insecticides through repeated use of the same mode of action (MoA) insecticide. It is always better to prevent resistance from developing than to deal with resistance once it has occurred. The cost of TPP resistance to New Zealand could be very significant, and this strategy is designed to reduce selection pressure for resistance as far as possible without jeopardising the quality of produce and export crops.

Potato crops are also subject to potato tuber moth and aphid pest pressure. Cross over of insecticide groups is probable when trying to manage these 3 major pests in this crop.

Management strategies aimed at reducing or preventing resistance will help prevent resistance from developing and conserve existing products for ongoing use.

Background

Since its 2006 detection in New Zealand, TPP has been responsible for yield and quality-reducing damage to potatoes as well as to other solanaceous crops such as capsicums, tomato and tamarillo. TPP is best known as the insect vector for the zebra chip disease-associated bacterium Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum but feeding by TPP on potatoes is also linked to damaging effects.

The general strategy is to reduce selection pressure for resistance by minimising insecticide applications, optimising spray timing, delivering insecticides accurately, rotating between insecticides from different chemical groups and using a pre-planned programme. This is combined with management practices for the crop and surrounding host plants that aim to reduce psyllid numbers (Page-Weir et al 2011, MacDonald et al 2015, Walker et al 2015, Wright 2017).

Note: Control failure does not always imply resistance.

Current Status of insecticide resistance

A study by Plant and Food Research (Watkins et al 2021, sponsored by Potatoes NZ) demonstrated that current contact insecticides commonly used showed no material difference in mortality of adults and nymphs between the ‘wild’ field-collected colony and the susceptible PFR TPP colony for all products tested.

A further study in 2022 (Watkins et al 2022, sponsored by Potatoes NZ) evaluated systemic and translaminar insecticides currently used for control of TPP. Again, no material difference was found in the performance of the insecticides tested.

While both trials were only applied to TPP populations collected around Canterbury, they indicate that there is currently no shift in sensitivity to the insecticides tested.

Insecticides for use in potatoes

The following active ingredients are registered for use in potato crops (Table 1). The key target pests and pest types are also identified (Aphids, Tomato Potato Psyllid (TPP), Potato Tuber Moth (PTM)). It is important to understand all products used for pest insect management in potato crops, as the use of one insecticide mode of action (MoA) group for the control of one pest may limit the opportunity to use the same MoA insecticide group at a later stage in the crop cycle for the control of a different pest.

Do not return to using a product from the same MoA group for at least one insect generation (4 weeks or more).

Table 1: Active ingredients with label claims for TPP, aphids and PTM in potatoes in New Zealand (November 2024)
IRAC mode of action insecticide group
Pesticide active ingredient(s) Registered for control of Maximum number of applications
1A Carbamates
Pirimicarb Aphids Not specified
1B Organophosphates
Acephate Aphid, TPP 3 per crop
It is an offence to use this product off label
3A Pyrethroids
Lambda-cyhalothrin PTM, TPP Not specified
Tau-fluvalinate Aphid, TPP 3 per crop
Deltamethrin PTM Not specified
3A + 6 Pyrethroids + avermectins
Acrinathrin + abamectin TPP 4 per season
4A Neonicotinoids
Thiacloprid Aphid, PTM, TPP 2 per crop
Thiamethoxam Aphid In-furrow, at planting
3A + 4A Pyrethroids + neonicotinoids
Deltamethrin + thiacloprid Aphid, PTM, TPP 2 per crop
4C Sulfoxamines
Sulfoxaflor Aphid 4 per season
5 Spinosyns
Spinetoram TPP 4 per season
Spinosad PTM 4 per season
6 Avermectins
Abamectin TPP 4 per season
9B Pyridine azomethine derivatives
Pymetrozine Aphids 2 per crop
15 Benzoylureas
Lufenuron TPP 2 per season
23 Tectronic and tetramic acid derivatives
Spiromesifen TPP 2 per crop
Spirotetramat TPP 3 per season
28 Diamides
Chlorantraniliprole PTM 3 per season
Cyantraniliprole TPP, PTM, green peach aphid 3 per season
29 Flonicamid
Flonicamid PTM, TTP 2 per season

This strategy has been written especially for TPP.

Crop management

Insecticide use

IPM in potato crops

The use of IPM principles is critical in ensuring insecticide resistance within TPP populations is minimised. IPM relies on the use key predator and parasitoid populations building up within potato crops to control TPP life stages. The use of selective insecticide products during the early to mid-stages of a crop will conserve resident natural enemies and enable these populations to build.

IPM research at Pukekohe and in Waikato commercial crops has validated reduced spray programs that are important additions for IRM for TPP (MacDonald et al 2015; Walker et al 2015). This is due to major reductions in number of insecticide applications required, being 10 less applications in early crop ‘fresh’ potatoes using validated action thresholds, and halving applications in summer main crops from about 10 to 5 sprays by applying a mineral oil alone every second week, rotated with selective insecticides plus oils (MacDonald et al 2015).

As part of the IPM program, and a sound resistance management strategy, regular surveys (every 5 years) of susceptibility of TPP, and other key pests, to commonly applied insecticide products should be undertaken in the major potato growing regions.

References

Potatoes New Zealand Tomato Potato Psyllid (TPP) Poster 2018.

MacDonald F.H., P. J. Wright, B.N. Hart, L.F. Guo, S.K. Hunt, G.P. Walker. 2022. On-farm trials towards reduced insecticides in main crop potatoes in the Waikato. New Zealand Plant Protection 75: 1–13.

Page-Weir NEM, Jamieson A, Chhagan A, Connolly PG, Curtis C. 2011 Efficacy of insecticides against tomato/potato psyllid (Bactericera cockerelli). New Zealand Plant Protection 64: 276–281.

Walker G.P., F.H. MacDonald, P.J. Wright, A.J. Puketapu, R. Gardner-Gee, P.G. Connolly, J.A.D. Anderson. 2015. Development of Action Thresholds for Management of Bactericera cockerelli and Zebra Chip Disease in Potatoes at Pukekohe, New Zealand. Am. J. Potato Res. 92:266-275

Watkins L, Drayton G, Butler R, Kean A, Preddey J, Vereijssen J. 2021 Tomato potato psyllid – contact insecticide efficacy.  Plant & Food Research report prepared for: Potatoes New Zealand Inc.

Watkins LM, Drayton G, Preddey J, Butler RC, Moore T, Kean AK, Nielsen MC, Vereijssen J. 2022 Testing the efficacy of selected systemic insecticides on tomato potato psyllid life stages.  Plant & Food Research report prepared for: Potatoes New Zealand Inc.

Wright P.J., G.P. Walker, F.H. MacDonald, R. Gardner-Gee, D.I. Hedderley 2017 Mineral oil foliar applications in combination with insecticides affect tomato potato psyllid (Bactericera cockerelli) and beneficial insects in potato crops. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science: Vol. 45, No. 4, 263–276